I hate Quasimoto! details inside

[Vicious Cycle]

I sometimes feel bad for Quasi. It seems like someone is always messing with him. Bro always has well thought out posts, that's for sure.

 

[juaneye]

I sometimes feel bad for Quasi. It seems like someone is always messing with him. Bro always has well thought out posts, that's for sure.

i don't think you need to feel bad for Quasimoto, he can definately take care of him self. he is obviously an audio learner and has not wasted his talent. good job Quasi, and i for another appreciate you sharing your knowledge with us.
now enough of the touchy fealy crap...lets get back to why we hate Quasi for christ's sake, ain't that what this thread is for?

 

[Vicious Cycle]

i don't think you need to feel bad for Quasimoto, he can definately take care of him self. he is obviously an audio learner and has not wasted his talent. good job Quasi, and i for another appreciate you sharing your knowledge with us.
now enough of the touchy fealy crap...lets get back to why we hate Quasi for christ's sake, ain't that what this thread is for?

I know, but it has to get old...

 

[bowflex2000]

Thanks allot Phreezer. It sincerely means allot to me , especially coming from you.



I'm Jewish by race, and by religion, although I don't practice the religion. As a matter of fact, I don't practice or even subscribe to any religion. I have 'faith', but its not in line with any organized practices.

The God question; If, by God, you mean a creator, I absolutely believe . I am convinced that there was an intelligent designer. I however, don't not believe there is an man or even spirit in the sky , watching everything we do, answering or ignoring prayers , or 'working in strange ways'.

I am sure that there were great floods, there is verifiable evidence everywhere to support this too. I'm ambivalent about a great 'Biblical' flood, one that caused a mass life extinction . I guess the jury is still out on that one for me.



I believe there is allot of physical evidence to support a creator. Have you ever heard of the mathematical proportion of Phi ? The proportion is so exact, and yet so repetitive that its impossible to ignore, if you look for it. There are so many examples of it, I could literally make 50 pages of posts of nothing but examples of Phi. Live births of humans, rabbits , fish and bee's ( amongst thousands of others ) . A sunflower, the earths resonant frequency, all are applicable to Phi.



Brother, look into what the Vatican calls , 'the divine proportion' of PHI , and I promise it will renew your optimism, although It likely wont renew your faith in 'religion'. Religion seems to be a unnatural conduit in guiding , and even limiting your own practice of the very faith you were born with. I need no such guidance, and I don't want the bounds of my faith limited . I wont allow it.

If I were you, I'd be encouraged knowing that you are STILL searching for the smoking gun, which means your faith is not exhausted just yet.

Good luck.

You probably already figured this, but you are also more intelligent than I, Quas. But I am still young and hope to acquire as much knowledge as possible. So maybe my questioning comes off as disrespect at times, but it's not my intention.

Anyways I am on the same plane as Phreezer, in terms of having doubts in religion and even a Supreme Being.

Could you explain a bit more on what this "Phi" thing is?

 

[purevi1]

You probably already figured this, but you are also more intelligent than I, Quas. But I am still young and hope to acquire as much knowledge as possible. So maybe my questioning comes off as disrespect at times, but it's not my intention.

Anyways I am on the same plane as Phreezer, in terms of having doubts in religion and even a Supreme Being.

Could you explain a bit more on what this "Phi" thing is?

start with this
http://www.geocities.com/robinhuiscool/Goldenratio.html



and than
http://goldennumber.net/theology.htm

 

[Quasimoto]

I sometimes feel bad for Quasi. It seems like someone is always messing with him. Bro always has well thought out posts, that's for sure.

You feel bad for me ? Thats kind of interesting. Is the perception that I am the nerd who gets picked on ?

It feels as though I am the one that does the messing with, more often than not. I have a very low tolerance for willful ignorance, and I work everyday to hold my tongue.

 

[Vicious Cycle]

You feel bad for me ? Thats kind of interesting. Is the perception that I am the nerd who gets picked on ?

It feels as though I am the one that does the messing with, more often than not. I have a very low tolerance for willful ignorance, and I work everyday to hold my tongue.

I'd say more like math geek

 

[Quasimoto]

I'd say more like math geek

HaHa. I don't often get picked on , but I'm not only a math geek.


So , give it to me straight. Why do you feel bad for me ?

 

[purevi1]

HaHa. I don't often get picked on , but I'm not only a math geek.

LOL AN ALL AROUND GEEK HAHA

instead of trusted member it should say MU's einstein

 

[M FREAKY]

LOL AN ALL AROUND GEEK HAHA

instead of trusted member it should say MU's einstein

lol,, Maybe we should consider changing Quas title to Math Geek

 

[purevi1]

lol,, Maybe we should consider changing Quas title to Math Geek

bwhahahhahaha

scooter or screech

 

[Vicious Cycle]

HaHa. I don't often get picked on , but I'm not only a math geek.


So , give it to me straight. Why do you feel bad for me ?

It appears that instead of posting about the original topic of a post people are always coming at you for some reason.

Sybog
Prometheus
zeitgeist
Shaq
Bodymechanic
Adjutant

That's just off the top of my head. As far as giving it to you straight, there's nothing to give really. From my limited prospective I see more people take issue with you than others for no real reason. Like I said before, just must get old after awhile is all.

So give it to me straight, do you think you are targeted more than others? If so, why?

 

[purevi1]

\
Sybog
Prometheus
zeitgeist
Shaq
Bodymechanic
Adjutant

2 of the guys on the list are idiots

 

[Baldspot]

I would think someone like Quasi would have a title more like -

Disquisitional Member.

The title itself is probably not known by alot of people as a common word, thereby requiring either

1) a small bit of effort to look it up and enhance your vernacular

or

2) be lazy and just ask what it is

The challenge being to challenge yourself not be lazy and learn something new. This seems to be the theme to most of Quasi's signature lines.

What say you Quasi, sound like you?

 

[Vicious Cycle]

2 of the guys on the list are idiots

Just two??? LOL!

 

[shaqdeezl]

It appears that instead of posting about the original topic of a post people are always coming at you for some reason.

Sybog
Prometheus
zeitgeist
Shaq
Bodymechanic
Adjutant

That's just off the top of my head. As far as giving it to you straight, there's nothing to give really. From my limited prospective I see more people take issue with you than others for no real reason. Like I said before, just must get old after awhile is all.

So give it to me straight, do you think you are targeted more than others? If so, why?

I'll not get sucked into another Quasi v Shaq drama but I'm interested in hearing how/where I debated with Quasimoto in a thread where I attempted to change the topic.

I've argued with Quasimoto three times.

1) Was about whether or not Clinton was impeached. I cannot remember the exact topic but it had something to do with immorality and politics. In my first response I called him 'numb nuts'. Something I should not have said. QM, if I never apologized for the name-calling...I'll do it now. Sorry.

2) The second time was about whether or not militarized chemical warfare agents had a shelf-life. He said they did - I said they didn't. It then morphed into something unprofessional lacking integrity and respect. Who led it there is beyond me but I really do not care.

3) Was about whether or not he'd ever done the EC. A thread I started in the Trusted Members forum and ended in GD. That dog has been buried and put to rest.

So, where did I go after Quasi while avoiding the original topic?

 

[Vicious Cycle]

I'll not get sucked into another Quasi v Shaq drama but I'm interested in hearing how/where I debated with Quasimoto in a thread where I attempted to change the topic.

I've argued with Quasimoto three times.

1) Was about whether or not Clinton was impeached. I cannot remember the exact topic but it had something to do with immorality and politics. In my first response I called him 'numb nuts'. Something I should not have said. QM, if I never apologized for the name-calling...I'll do it now. Sorry.

2) The second time was about whether or not militarized chemical warfare agents had a shelf-life. He said they did - I said they didn't. It then morphed into something unprofessional lacking integrity and respect. Who led it there is beyond me but I really do not care.

3) Was about whether or not he'd ever done the EC. A thread I started in the Trusted Members forum and ended in GD. That dog has been buried and put to rest.

So, where did I go after Quasi while avoiding the original topic?

And I'll not get sucked into anything. I mearly stated that it seems to me that for one reason or another people seem to take issue with Quasi. I also said that I thougt it was for no reason. If anyone is reading more into it than that, that is on them. Jesus.


EDIT:
Everyone should swim on the surface once in awhile; not EVERYTHING has to be so D E E P....

 

[shaqdeezl]

And I'll not get sucked into anything. I mearly stated that it seems to me that for one reason or another people seem to take issue with Quasi. I also said that I thougt it was for no reason. If anyone is reading more into it than that, that is on them. Jesus.


EDIT:
Everyone should swim on the surface once in awhile; not EVERYTHING has to be so D E E P....

Then when you're compiling a list of people who have taken issue with Quasimoto about topics which can be argued to be irrelevant, your list would be more precise if my name was not included. I enjoy a debate when people make posts that are not factually accurate. That's all I've ever done and am doing here.

 

[Vicious Cycle]

Then when you're compiling a list of people who have taken issue with Quasimoto about topics which can be argued to be irrelevant, your list would be more precise if my name was not included. I enjoy a debate when people make posts that are not factually accurate. That's all I've ever done and am doing here.

Are you fucking kidding me? Let it go. Compiling a list? You make it sound like some conspiracy theory.

Christ Almighty! I will say it again for those not as smart as Quasi; all I did was say that I felt bad for Quasi because it seemed like people went out of there way to fuck with him for no good reason. He asked me why I felt bad for him and I told him and provided a few examples of folks.

Swim on the surface…

 

[shaqdeezl]

No, I'm not kidding. Keep my name out of your mouth. Since you're a surface swimmer that shouldn't be hard for you to comprehend.

Are you fucking kidding me? Let it go. Compiling a list? You make it sound like some conspiracy theory.

Christ Almighty! I will say it again for those not as smart as Quasi; all I did was say that I felt bad for Quasi because it seemed like people went out of there way to fuck with him for no good reason. He asked me why I felt bad for him and I told him and provided a few examples of folks.

Swim on the surface…